If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Consorship. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Consorship paper right on time.
Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Consorship, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Consorship paper at affordable prices!
Should there be limits to free speech? Many Americans would answer No to this question. Freedom of expression is one of the basic privileges bestowed on all Americans by the Bill of Rights, the first ten Amendments to the constitution. Traditionally, no form of expression should be censored unless it poses a direct harm to others.
But the question inevitably arises regarding the kinds of harm from which people should be protected-from racists who preach hatred and foment violence? From anarchists who advocate an end to legitimate government? From people or organizations which promote harmful products or which vividly portray sex or violence in the public media?
While some Americans believe the public should be protected from all of these things, others say that such protections are merely forms of censorship. Preventing an anarchist from preaching revolution is one step toward censoring all unpopular kinds of expression.
Which brings us to a final question, "Is censorship so important that we must regulate everything from music to even what we are wearing?" Hopefully you will be able to base your own decisions, however, that is one main problem with censorship, you, as an individual, no longer think for yourself, you follow aimlessly, and without hope, simply doing what everyone else is. Think for yourself, draw your own conclusions. After reading this paper, you will be on one side of the fence, Pro. or Con. There is no in-between. Censorship is in fact harmful; we are censored so much in one day alone, that we don't even know about it, be it in the movies we watch and music we listen to. These two main points will be discussed in detail with hope that you will draw your own conclusions.Order custom research paper on Consorship
Before we get too far first we should define Censorship. Dave Marsh, Author of 50 Ways to Fight Censorship defines censorship as the removal of material from open access by government authority. (P. 1)
In "The entertainment Industry should Be Censored" David Lowenthal states that "…in movies and television that harm from even a single showing can be widespread…"(P. 14) However, Mortimer B. Zuckerman, author of "The Entertainment Media Should Not Be Censored" states that
…excessive censorship of movies is not needed.
Hollywood, which has had many movies that
have exposed prejudice, racism and other
social problems, also maintains a rating system
that informs parents which movies are
unsuitable for children..." (P. 151)
Now, keep in mind that Hollywood is warning parents about graphic violence and sex in movies. In fact all TV shows have a rating system blatantly showing parents what their children will be seeing.
Music is a very sensitive subject, due to the fact that no matter what you do, or where you are, there is always music playing somewhere. Be it at the supermarket, the dentists' office, and let's not forget your car. Music is everywhere; there is no denying it.
John Leo, author of "Censoring Obscene Music is justified" states that
The issue at the heart of the controversy over
music is not censorship, artistic freedom, sex
or even obscene language. The real problem,
I think is this Because of the influence of a
few not very distinguished music group, 10
and 1 year-old boys now walk down the
street chanting about the joys of damaging a
girl's vagina during sex."(P. 8)
Numerous questions come to mind when I read this quote. However one question really makes me wonder. How are young children getting these songs? Well many people argue off the Internet, this solution is simple; parents have to watch their kids when they are on the net. Problem solved.
Thomas Storck, author of the article Censorship Can Be Beneficial, makes
the claim that
Ideas lead to actions, and bad ideas often lead to bad
acts, bringing harm to individuals and possible ruin to
societies. Just as the state has the right to restrict and
direct a person's actions when he is a physical threat
to the community, so also in the matter of intellectual
or cultural threats, the authorities have duties to
protect the community."(P. 17)
Ideas lead to actions, and bad ideas often lead to bad acts." Well now, does this mean that the government has to regulate everything? Honestly now, do our clothes harm ourselves or other people? Does my Slipknot shirt jump off my back and hit the old lady in the head? No! Simply because I wear a shirt that has the word "Asshole" blazoned across the back doesn't mean I am a neo-nazi, ready to bomb the nearby Synagogue.
One final point I wish to make, as you may have noticed, I am adamantly against censorship. However I often wonder if censorship is really necessary. If you can recall earlier both points I made about "true parenting". If parents would take control of their children, censorship would not exist. If parents lay down the basic groundwork for how they expect their children to act, the basic principle for censorship is invalid. Remember, the basic principle used for censorship is "to protect our children."
Unfortunately, censorship fanatics have convinced themselves that dirty lyrics, movies, or words in print, are the problem, when in reality, the problem is ourselves.
Once we begin to exempt from First Amendment protections words and ideas that offend some of us, the list of exceptions that affects us only grows longer. It does not shrink.
President Bush would outlaw flag burning.
Jesse Helms would outlaw homoerotic art.
Author and radical feminist Andrea Dworkin would censor any art, photos or films that, in her view, treat women as sex objects.
Some minority college students would censor all forms of expression that offend their sensibilities, including classroom discussions and student newspaper opinions.
In conclusion, the only thing I ask of you is to follow your own path. Do not follow like a flock of sheep, blindly being herded and told lies. Get the information, and decide for yourself.
Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press."First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Works Cited
Leo, John. "Censoring Obscene Music is Justified." Censorship Opposing Viewpoints.
Ed. Lisa Orr. San Diego Greenhaven Press, 10. 8-1
Lowenthal, David. "The entertainment Industry Should Be Censored" Censorship
Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. Tamara L. Roleff. San Diego Greenhaven Press.
00. 14-156
Marsh, Dave. 50 Ways to Fight Censorship. New York Thunder's Mouth Press, 10
Storck, Thomas. "Censorship can be Beneficial." Censorship Opposing Viewpoints.
Ed. Byron L. Stay. San Diego Greenhaven Press. 17. 17-4
Zuckerman, Mortimer B. "The Entertainment Media Should not be Censored."
Censorship Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. Byron L. Stay. San Diego
Greenhaven Press. 17. 151-15
Please note that this sample paper on Consorship is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Consorship, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Consorship will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!