If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on changes in war poetry. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality changes in war poetry paper right on time.
Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in changes in war poetry, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your changes in war poetry paper at affordable prices!
Investigate the change of war poetry from 1800 to the present day.
When investigating the change of war poetry from 1800 to the present day, you can clearly notice there is a definite contrast between the poems.
As the poems are fundamentally different in their approach to the topic, the rhyming schemes, structure, and language are also vastly different. However, the subject matter of the poem is obviously generally the same.
All of the poems I have looked at have the same purpose, to convey the poets own beliefs against war, for example, Wilfred Owen was an avid anti-war activist, despite, or perhaps because of, the fact he fought in world war one.
The poems I have looked at from 1800 to the present day have a very similar content because the topic is common to all of them.
When comparing the early war poems with more recent war poems, such as Jessie Popes' 'War Girls', and Wilfred Owens' 'Anthem For Doomed Youth', with James Fenton's' 'Tiananmen', and Cairon Carson's' 'Belfast Confetti', you can clearly notice that the presentation of war is quite different. The first two poems were written at the beginning of the First World War and therefore the true disastrous effects had not been experienced. Therefore, no one was aware of what would happen. Whereas, in the more recent poems, the poets knew the consequences so the language is very different.
Before the war, poets seduced the readers by using a romantic ideal. They wrote about how joining the war would make them heroic and how they would be patriotic by dying for a land that is 'England forever'.
The modern poets, such as Carson are so disorientated by the violence they are unable to say what they want as the incidents haunts the writer as they try to explain the events.
Another main difference in the poetry is the structure. Over the years the structure of the poetry would differ because more people became aware of what to expect.
Also the moods of the poetry have changed over the years. Before the war the poets wrote with pride about how good it would be fighting for your country. Now poets write with disbelief and anger because of the consequences.
The tone of the poems also has progressed over the years. Before the war the tone of the poems was joyous and happy, although today, we now know the disastrous effects. The tone of the poem becomes very saddening.
The early poems have a tremendous effect on the reader because of the rhythm. The rhythm stirs the reader up because the poems are full of honour. 'The Burial Of Sir John Moore' has a very effective rhythm as the rhythm of the poem echoes the march of the soldiers.
Although the poets wrote at the same time, their views were still different. Wilfred Owens 'Anthem For Doomed Youth' was written towards the end of the war, when any novelty there may have been would have worn off, therefore the poem would be anti-war. However, Jessie Popes' poem 'Who's For The Game?' is completely different. She compares the war to a game, thus implying that there is little danger on the battlefield. Pope also refers to the war as a sport, where by a player would return with just a minor injury, such as a crutch.
Early pro-war poems, such as 'Who's For The Game?' use the power of persuasion to make men join the army. Jessie Pope persuades the men to join by making them feel deceitful and cowardly. But she also has a friendly manner in her propaganda poem as she refers to the men as lads. She pressurizes the men into joining the forces with her assumption that they will do their country proud.
Poetry also differs over the years because poets used to glorify the war. In 'Vitai Lampada', Sir Henry Newbolt glorifies the war by constantly saying, "Play up! Play up! And play the game!" with a totally contrasting view Wilfred Owens' 'Dulce est Decorum et' claims war should be taken seriously, not treated as child's play.
In conclusion, after studying many different war poems, I can clearly tell how war poetry has changed from 1800 to the present.
Pre-war poetry articulated a view of ease, happiness and romance towards conflict. The battles were hailed as heroic, joyous and glorious, and there was nothing to dispel this view.
Post war poetry is more poignant and stresses the devastation and sadness caused by conflict.
Please note that this sample paper on changes in war poetry is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on changes in war poetry, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on changes in war poetry will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!